Home / Aerospace and defense program execution
When an aerospace or defense program needs help, the first call is often to a staffing agency. Sometimes that is exactly right. Often it is not, because the problem is not a missing person. It is a program that needs to be led somewhere different.
The short version
| Staffing agency | Program management firm | |
|---|---|---|
| You are buying | A qualified person | A program outcome |
| Who owns the result | You | Shared, with the firm accountable for delivery |
| Methods and controls | You supply them | The firm brings them |
| Direction | You direct the placed person | The firm leads the work |
| Team | Usually one person per role | Program leadership plus project engineers |
| When it ends | When the placement ends | When the program is delivering |
| Best for | Adding capacity to a healthy program | Changing the direction of a program |
What a staffing agency actually sells
A staffing agency's product is a placement. Its job is to find a person with the right experience and get them into your program quickly. Good agencies are very good at that. But once the person starts, the agency's responsibility ends. The placed program manager inherits your schedule, your constraints and your politics, and has to succeed inside them largely alone.
That works when the program already has sound methods and leadership and simply needs more capacity. It works much less well when the reason you need help is that the program is going wrong.
What a program management firm sells
A program management firm sells the result. It brings a way of working: how schedules are built and tested, how earned value is tracked, how risk is managed, how suppliers are recovered. It brings a team, typically program leadership supported by project engineers who can do the technical work themselves. And it stays until the program is delivering.
The deliverables are different too. A placement produces a person's time. A program management engagement produces a schedule that survives being taken apart, a recovery plan the customer can check, technical data packages, documentation and, where needed, hardware through development and into production.
How to tell which one you need
Ask one question: if the right person walked in tomorrow, would they know what to do and have what they need to do it?
If yes, you have a capacity problem, and a good placement may solve it. If the honest answer is that they would first have to work out what is actually wrong, rebuild the schedule and win back the customer, you have a direction problem. That needs a firm that owns the outcome.
How do they compare side by side?
| Staffing agency | Program management firm | |
|---|---|---|
| What you buy | A person's time, under your direction | An outcome, delivered by a team under the firm's management |
| Who owns the result | You | The firm is accountable for execution, alongside your leadership |
| Method | Whatever the individual brings | The firm's methods, controls and tools |
| Continuity | Ends with the placement; replacement starts from zero | The firm covers absences and transitions within the team |
| Management load on you | You direct, review and integrate the work | You set direction and review results |
| Knowledge left behind | Leaves with the person | Documented as part of the engagement |
| Best fit | A defined role on a program that is otherwise healthy | A program that needs to go somewhere different |
Which one really costs less?
An hourly rate comparison usually favors the agency, and on a healthy program where you simply need capacity, that comparison is fair. On a program in trouble it misleads. The real cost includes your managers' time directing and checking the work, the weeks a placed individual spends learning your methods, the rework when the approach is wrong, and above all the cost of schedule: on a defense program, a few weeks of slip on the critical path can outweigh the entire difference in rates. The right comparison is total cost to reach the outcome, not cost per hour.
What questions should you ask before choosing?
- Do we know exactly what needs to be done, and only lack the hands to do it? If yes, an agency may be enough.
- Does the program need to change direction, recover, or be set up properly? If yes, you need a team that owns the approach.
- Who will manage the added people, and do they have the time?
- What happens if the person leaves halfway through?
- Will the knowledge stay with us when the engagement ends?
- How will we measure whether it worked?
Can the two work together?
Yes, and on larger programs they often do. A program management firm can set up and run the program's controls while agency staff fill defined roles within that structure. The combination works when the firm owns the method and the integration and the placed staff work within it. It fails when nobody owns the whole and each person follows their own approach.
What should accountability look like in the contract?
With a staffing agency, the contract usually describes a role, a rate and a term. With a program management firm, it should describe outcomes: the baseline delivered and accepted, the recovery milestones reached, the closeout items completed. That difference is the point. When the agreement names the result, both sides can see whether it was achieved, and the firm has every reason to bring the right people and methods rather than simply fill hours. Whichever model you choose, write down how success will be measured before the work starts, and review it on a fixed rhythm.
Who directs the work day to day?
With agency staff, your managers direct the work: they set priorities, assign tasks and review the output. With a program management firm, you set the goals and priorities, and the firm organizes and directs its own team to meet them, reporting results to you. That difference in direction and control is also why the two are contracted differently, and it is worth being clear about which model you are buying before the work starts.
How do you evaluate a program management firm?
By asking for evidence of the method, not a description of it. Every firm says it brings structure. The useful questions test whether that structure exists, who will actually apply it to your program, and what you keep when the engagement ends.
| Criterion | What to ask | A strong answer | A warning sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| Method | Show us how you build and test a schedule | A worked example: logic-linked activities, a critical path that holds up, and a health check such as the DCMA 14-point assessment run against it | Slides about methodology with no sample output |
| Who does the work | Who will be on our program, and in what role? | Named program leadership and engineers who work inside the program | A senior partner at the pitch and junior staff on the job |
| Domain fit | What programs like ours have you run? | Specific experience with qualification, certification, production transition or the customer you face | General project management across unrelated industries |
| Reporting | How will we know where the program stands? | Status against the baseline on a fixed rhythm, with changes and trade-offs shown to leadership | Activity reports that list effort rather than progress |
| Data and access | Where will program data live? | Inside your systems, under your control | Program data held in the firm's own tools |
| Exit | What does the end of the engagement look like? | A defined end state and a handover plan | An open-ended scope with no measure of done |
If the buyer is a government program office, the difference also has a contracting side. FAR Subpart 37.1 describes a personal services contract as one where contractor personnel are, in effect, supervised like government employees, and FAR 37.104 says agencies shall not award personal services contracts unless a statute authorizes them. A firm that directs its own team toward agreed results matches the way nonpersonal services are meant to work. Contractors buying support for their own programs have more freedom, but the same question of who directs the work should shape how the agreement is written.
What should a program management firm leave behind?
A program that runs without it. The goal of a good engagement is not permanent dependence. When the firm leaves, one of two things should be true: the program is delivering on its commitments, with milestone payments achieved and production deliveries started, or your organization has a repeatable program office process and a team that knows how to run it. Often both. The records below make that possible, and they should sit in your systems, not the firm's.
| What is left | Why it matters | Public benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated master schedule | The single plan the team works to, logic-linked and statused | GAO Schedule Assessment Guide, GAO-16-89G |
| Estimate at completion and its basis | What the remaining work will really cost, and why | GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide, GAO-20-195G, and EIA-748 where earned value is required |
| Risk and opportunity register | Open risks with owners and mitigation tied to the schedule | The DoD risk, issue and opportunity management guide for defense acquisition programs |
| Baseline and change records | The approved configuration and every change made to it | EIA-649 configuration management |
| Closeout record | Requirements verified, deliverables accepted, open items assigned an owner | The contract's own acceptance and closeout terms |
Ask for this list at the start, not the end. A staffing placement rarely includes it, because the placed person's job is the role, not the handover. With a firm, the handover is part of what you are paying for, and it belongs in the agreement next to the outcomes. Our way of working and our approach to project closeout are built around it, and the schedule itself follows our Microsoft Project scheduling standard.
What does a program management firm need from you?
Three things: the authority to make day to day decisions inside agreed boundaries, an interdisciplinary team that includes the people doing the work, and access to the information and systems the program runs on. Without them, even a strong firm ends up reporting on the program instead of leading it. When a resource cannot be made available, a good firm says so, sets out the alternatives, and shows leadership the cost, schedule, performance and risk consequences of each path, so the decision stays with you. If you are unsure whether your program needs that level of help, an independent program assessment or a program health check is a smaller first step. To talk it through, schedule a call.
Related guides
- Aerospace and defense program execution
- Independent program assessment
- Aerospace and defense program recovery
Where Set Boundaries fits
Set Boundaries is a program execution firm. We plan programs so they start right, recover them when they slip, and close them out properly, with a PMP-certified program manager leading project engineers who work inside the program. Clients bring us in when the program needs to go somewhere different, not only when it needs another person.
Holly is able to quickly formulate and execute detailed project plans transforming chaotic programs into predictable successes. Key to Holly's triumphs is her deep project management knowledge, work ethic and clear communication style.
Talk about what your program needs
References
- Federal Acquisition Regulation, Subpart 37.1, Service Contracts, General, including FAR 37.104, Personal services contracts.
- US Government Accountability Office, Schedule Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Project Schedules, GAO-16-89G.
- US Government Accountability Office, Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide, GAO-20-195G.
- SAE International and the Electronic Industries Alliance, EIA-748, Earned Value Management Systems.
- EIA-649, Configuration Management Standard.
- US Department of Defense, Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs.
Questions
Common questions
What is the main difference between a staffing agency and a program management firm?
A staffing agency provides a person to fill a role, working under your direction, and the program outcome remains entirely your responsibility. A program management firm provides a team that brings its own methods and controls and takes accountability for executing the program alongside your leadership. One sells capacity; the other sells a result.
Is a staffing agency cheaper?
Per hour, often yes. Over the life of a troubled program, often no. The real cost includes your managers directing the work, ramp-up time, rework when the approach is wrong, and the cost of schedule slip, which on defense programs can outweigh the difference in rates many times over. Compare the total cost to reach the outcome rather than the hourly rate.
When is a staffing agency the better choice?
When the program is healthy, the approach is clear, and you need a specific skill or extra capacity for a defined period under your own management. For example, a scheduler to maintain an already sound schedule, or an engineer to cover a leave of absence. In those cases a firm would add cost without adding value, and an agency is the sensible choice.
When is a program management firm the better choice?
When the program needs to go somewhere different: a recovery, a new program that must be set up properly, a closeout that has stalled, or a program where nobody has the time or experience to own the whole. In those situations the value comes from the method and the accountability, not only from the hours, which is what a firm provides and an individual placement does not.
What happens if a placed contractor leaves mid-program?
With a staffing agency, the replacement usually starts from zero, and the program absorbs the learning curve again. A program management firm covers transitions within its own team, and because the work is documented as part of the engagement, the knowledge does not leave with one person. On a critical program, that continuity can matter more than any difference in rates.
Can we use both a firm and agency staff?
Yes. On larger programs a program management firm often sets up and runs the program's controls while agency staff fill defined roles within that structure. It works well when the firm owns the method and integration and everyone works to one plan. It fails when several people follow different approaches and nobody owns the whole program.
Why would a company use a staffing agency?
Companies use staffing agencies to add qualified people quickly, cover a temporary gap, handle a workload peak, or try out a candidate before hiring. The agency handles sourcing, screening and often payroll, which saves the company time. For an aerospace or defense program that is basically healthy and simply short a scheduler or program manager, that can be the right answer. When the program itself needs a new direction, one placed person is rarely enough. Set Boundaries is a program management firm that takes shared accountability for the outcome instead.
What are the disadvantages of using a staffing agency?
The main disadvantage is that the agency's responsibility usually ends once the person starts, so the company still owns the outcome, the methods and the direction. Other drawbacks include markups on hourly rates, variable fit with the team, knowledge that leaves when the placement ends, and limited support for the placed person inside a difficult program. On a troubled aerospace or defense program those gaps matter most. Set Boundaries brings program leadership, project engineers and proven controls together, so the work does not depend on one person succeeding alone.
Have a question that is not here? Ask Holly on a short call
